Testimony of John of Nikius about the Patriarchs of Constantinople Menas and John Scholasticus: delusion or falsification?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54700/jfm9fm95

Keywords:

мonophysitism, monothelitism, will, judgement, nature, Acts, Epistle, dogmatics, polemics, quaternion, handwriting, expertise

Abstract

The Chronicle of John of Nikius contains a message, that in the Epistle to Vigilius, Patriarch Menas of Constanitople speaks of the “one will and one judgement” of Christ. The so-called Epistle of Menas to Vigilius to which John of Nikius refers, is most likely a Monothelite falsification, created under Patriarch Sergius and included in the Acts of the V Ecumenical Council under Patriarch Paul. The attribution of the formula “one will, one judgement” to Menas is in blatant contradiction with the texts of St. Patriarch, who faithfully adhered to Justinian’s theology. Probably, the fake did not seem particularly convincing to its creators, so they did not publish it widely, which is why it was not preserved in Monophysite writings (Coptic, Ethiopian, Syriac, Armenian, Jacobite, Arabic). Only the key quote “one will, one judgement” has reached us, which, in particular, was preserved by John of Nikius. During the time of Patriarchs Sergius and Paul, other falsifications were created, for example, the so-called Book of Vigilius, translated from Greek into Latin. All of them were expertly exposed at the VI Ecumenical Council. John of Nikius, in addition to Patriarch Menas, attributes Monophysite (more specifically, Monothelite) views also to St. Patriarch John Scholasticus, entering into a striking contradiction even with Monophysite writers, in particular with John of Ephesus, who considers John Scholasticus a semi-Nestorian. The persecution launched by Patriarch John Scholasticus against Monophysite bishops convincingly testifies against his “monothelitism”. The Monophysite chronicler’s attribution of Monothelite views to Orthodox writers can be explained by his polemical tendentiousness towards Orthodoxy and the need to take revenge for the defeat of Monophysitism at the VI Ecumenical Council.

Author Biography

  • Protodeacon Vladimir Vasilik, Sretensky Theological Academy

    Vasilik Vladimir Vladimirovich
    Doctor of History, Candidate of Theology, Candidate of Philology, Professor of Sretensky Theological Academy, Professor of St. Petersburg State University (Russia)

References

Беневич Г. И. Богословско-полемические сочинения прп. Максима Испо­ведника и его полемика против моноэнергизма и монофелитства // Максим Исповедник, прп. Богословско-полемические сочинения (Opus­cula Theologica et Polemica). Санкт-Петербург, 2014.

Беневич Г. И. Моноэнергизм и монофелитство VII в.: Сергий, Кир, Пирр и другие // Антология восточно-христианской богословской мысли. Т. 2. Москва ; Санкт-Петербург, 2009.

Беневич Г. И., Шуфрин А. М. Дело Максима // Максим Исповедник: полемика с оригенизмом и моноэнергизмом. Санкт-Петербург, 2007.

Беневич Г. И., Шуфрин А. М. Максим Исповедник: полемика с моноэнергизмом и монофелитством // Антология восточно-христианской богословской мысли. Т. 2. 2009.

Болотов. В.В. Лекции по истории Древней Церкви. Т. 4. Санкт-Петербург, 1994.

Василик В. В. К проблеме Нерукотворных образов Христа (об Александрийском Мандилионе) // Сретенское слово. Москва : Изд-во Сретенской духовной академии, 2022. № 3.

Геростериос А. Юстиниан Великий — император и святой. Москва : Изд-во Сретенского монастыря, 2010.

Заболотный Е. А., Зайцев Д. В. Мина // Православная энциклопедия. Т. 45. Москва, 2000.

Максим Исповедник, прп. Мистагогия // Преподобный Максим Исповедник. Творения. Т. 1. Москва : Мартис, 1995.

Мейендорф И., протопр. Единство империи и разделения христиан: Церковь в 450–680 гг. Москва, 2012.

Мейендорф Иоанн, прот. Иисус Христос в восточном православном богословии. Москва, 2000.

Мейендорф И., прот. Император Ираклий и монофелитство // Единство империи и разделения христиан: Церковь в 450–680 гг. Москва, 2012.

Родионов М. А., Сарабьев А. В. Марониты: традиции, история, политика / Институт востоковедения РАН. Москва : ИВ РАН, 2013.

Сидоров А. И. Преподобный Максим Исповедник // Преподобный Максим Исповедник. Творения. Т. 1. Москва : Мартис, 1995.

Соловьев В. С. Россия и Вселенская Церковь. Москва, 2011.

Французов С. А. Иоанн Никиусский // Православная энциклопедия. T. 23. Москва, 2008.

Юлаев Федор, иером. Монофелитство // Православная энциклопедия. Т. 46. Москва, 2017.

Barbour R. Greek Literary Hands from 400 to 1600. Oxford, 1981.

Booth Ph. Crisis of Empire: Doctrine and Dissent at the End of Late Antiquity. Berkeley (Calif.), 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520280427.001.0001

Carcione F. Vigilio nelle controversie cristologiche del suo tempo: I rapporti con Giustiniano dagli anni dell’apocrisariato al secondo editto imperiale sui Tre Capitoli (533–551) // Studi e ricerche sull’Oriente cristiano. T. 10. 1987.

Carrol W. H. The Transformation of Pope Vigilius // Faith and Reason. Oxford, 1982. Vol. 8.

Duchesne L. L‘Église au VIe siècle. Paris; Fontemoing, 1925.

Grillmeier A. Jesus der Christus im Glauben der Kirche. Freiburg i. Br.; Basel; Wien, 1989. Bd. 2. Tl. 2: Die Kirche von Konstantinopel im 6. Jh.

Janin R. Mena di Constantinople // BiblSS. Paris, 1967. Vol. 9. Col. 318–319.

Jankowiak M. Essai d’histoire politique du monothélisme à partir de la correspondance entre les empereurs byzantins, les patriarches de Constantinople et les papes de Rome: Diss. Paris; Warsz., 2009.

Jankowiak M. The Invention of Dyotheletism // Studia patristica. 2013. Vol. 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.35841785.29

Jean de Nikiou. Chronicle. Paris, 1883.

Lampe G. Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford, 1961.

Lange Chr. Mia Energeia: Untersuchungen zur Einigungspolitik des Kaisers Heraclius und des Patriarchen Sergius von Constantinopel. Tübingen, 2012.

Larison D. Return to Authority: The Monothelete Controversy and the Role of Text, Emperor and Council in the 6th Ecumenical Council: Diss. Chicago, 2009.

Leroi J. Le types de reglure grecque. Paris, 1965.

Price R. Général introduction // Acts of the Lateran Synod of 649 / Ed., transl. R. Price. Liverpool, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/978-1-78138-039-0

Price R. Monotheletism: A Heresy or a Form of Words? // Studia patristica. 2010. Vol. 46.

Schieffer R. Zur Beurteilung des norditalienischen Dreikapitelschismas: Eine überlieferungsgeschichtliche Studie // ZKG. 1976. Bd. 87.

The Oxford Handbook of Maximus the Confessor / Ed. P. Allen, B. Neil. Oxford, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

Issue

Section

Historical Theology