Francis Fukuyama’s concept of human nature in the context of transhumanism: a view from the position of Orthodox anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54700/krp28555Keywords:
human nature, transhumanism, Francis Fukuyama, Orthodox anthropology, «Factor X», ethics, democracy, biotechnology, theosis, secularismAbstract
The article examines the concept of human nature as articulated by the American philosopher Francis Fukuyama and analyzes his critical stance towards transhumanism as a worldview and technological movement that challenges traditional conceptions of humanity. The author explores Fukuyama’s key philosophical notions, such as “human nature” and “Factor X”, which he regards as an essential normative core necessary to preserve ethical responsibility, universality of rights, and social stability of democratic institutions in an era of radical technological change. According to Fukuyama, technological interventions in human nature threaten to erode the foundations of public morality and generate new forms of social inequality. The article also analyzes Fukuyama’s concept from the perspective of Orthodox anthropology, revealing a fundamental difference in approaches to understanding human nature. While Fukuyama draws on biological and secular approaches, advocating the need to preserve the unchanging core of human essence, Orthodox theology views humans as integral spiritual and physical beings, endowed with the image of God and destined for deification. The article emphasizes that the Orthodox tradition not only preserves the natural status quo, but offers a path to spiritual perfection through collaboration with God. The article concludes by arguing that Fukuyama’s secular anthropology is insufficient to address the profound existential and ethical questions posed by both theology and transhumanism, emphasizing the need to integrate an Orthodox anthropological perspective into contemporary scientific and philosophical discourse.
References
Антропология // Церковно-научный центр «Православная энциклопедия». Москва, 2001. URL: https://www.pravenc.ru/text/114070.html (дата обращения: 16.07.2025).
Леонов, В., прот. Цифровая трансформация в жизни современного общества: религиозный аспект // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология. 2021. Т. 6. № 2(22). С. 35–68.
Леонов В. А., прот. Основы православной антропологии : Учебник / 3-е изд., испр. и доп. Москва : Изд-во Сретенского монастыря, 2023. 544 с.
Мефодий (Зинковский), иером. Православное богословие личности и проблематика искусственного интеллекта // Христианское чтение. 2020. № 6. С. 10–24.
Мефодий (Зинковский), иером. Богословие личности и биотехнологии улучшения человека // Вестник Русской Христианской Гуманитарной Академии. 2018. № 4. С. 188–194.
Фукуяма Ф. Идентичность: стремление к признанию и политика неприятия / пер. с англ. Москва : АСТ, 2019. 224 с.
Фукуяма Ф. Истоки политического порядка. Москва : АСТ, 2011. 608 с.
Фукуяма Ф. (а). Конец истории и последний человек. Москва : АСТ, 2004. 592 с.
Фукуяма Ф. (b). Наше постчеловеческое будущее: Последствия биотехнологической революции. Москва : АСТ, 2004. 320 с.
Bostrom N. In Defense of Posthuman Dignity // Bioethics. 2005. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 207–219.
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York : Free Press, 1992. 418 p.
Fukuyama F. Transhumanism: The World’s Most Dangerous Idea // Foreign Policy. 2004. No. 144. P. 42–43.
Hughes J. Embracing Change with All Four Arms: A Post-Humanist Defense of Genetic Engineering // Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics. 2004. Vol. 14. No. 6. P. 201–204.
Rubin C. T. [Рецензия на кн.: Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future] // The New Atlantis. 2002. No. 1. P. 90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suvorov M. A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

